Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Notification No. 42/78 as amended by Notification No. 214/78 applied to leather shaving blades used in hydraulic leather shaving machines.
Analysis: The exemption under the notification was available to hydraulic leather shaving machines. The duty entry for the blades was tied to the rate applicable to the machine or mechanical appliance with which the cutting blade was designed to be used. On that footing, and following the cited precedent, the benefit of the notification could not be denied merely because the goods imported were blades used in the machine and not the complete machine itself.
Conclusion: The notification applied to the blades used in the hydraulic leather shaving machines, and the denial of exemption was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the assessee succeeded in the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the tariff rate for an article is determined with reference to the machine with which it is designed to be used, an exemption notification applicable to that machine extends to the article for the purpose of determining the duty liability.