Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the letters "APEL" printed on voltage stabilizers manufactured by the assessee amounted to use of another person's brand name so as to deny the benefit of the small scale exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E.
Analysis: Paragraph 7 of Notification No. 175/86-C.E. withdraws the exemption where specified goods bear the brand name or trade name of another person not eligible for the exemption. Explanation 8 gives a wide meaning to brand name or trade name and covers any name, mark, label, invented word or writing used to indicate a connection in the course of trade between the goods and some person. On the facts, the authority below accepted the assessee's explanation that "APEL" was only intended to show that the goods were meant for APEL, without examining whether the marking indicated a trade connection with APEDCL or the nature of its commercial activity. The record required deeper inquiry before the expression could be treated as outside the scope of the notification.
Conclusion: The finding that the use of "APEL" did not attract paragraph 7 was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh decision after proper examination and hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: A word or marking may constitute a brand name for exemption purposes if it indicates a connection in the course of trade between the goods and another person, even where the identity of that person is not expressly stated.