Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether synthetic tops produced from synthetic fibre waste and yarn waste, after sorting, cutting, carding, garnetting and combing, amounted to a distinct excisable product classifiable under Tariff Item 18 of the Central Excise Tariff.
Analysis: The processes undertaken were not confined to garnetting alone but included sorting, cutting into smaller lengths, carding, orientation of fibres and combing. These steps went beyond a mere opening-up of fibres incidental to spinning and resulted in conversion of the waste into a different commodity. The tops were an intermediate product used for making worsted yarn and were traded as such, which supported the finding of excisability and classification under the relevant tariff item.
Conclusion: The synthetic tops were correctly classified under Tariff Item 18 and the appellant's contention that the processes did not amount to manufacture was rejected.