Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether compulsory acquisition of the assessee's electricity undertaking under the Madras Electricity Supply Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1954 fell within the expression "transfer" in section 12B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 so as to attract capital gains tax.
Analysis: Section 12B(1) used the words "sale", "exchange", "relinquishment" and "transfer" as distinct expressions. The expression "transfer" was held to be independent of the preceding words and not controlled by the doctrine of ejusdem generis. The Court reasoned that the word had to be given its plain and natural meaning, and that a compulsory acquisition effected by operation of law was still a transfer for the purposes of the section. The earlier proviso excluding compulsory acquisition and the later amendment in the 1961 Act were treated as supporting the conclusion that the legislative intent was to tax gains arising from compulsory acquisition.
Conclusion: Compulsory acquisition under the 1954 Act came within section 12B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and the surplus arising therefrom was liable to tax as capital gains.
Ratio Decidendi: For section 12B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, "transfer" includes transfer by operation of law, including compulsory acquisition, and is not confined to voluntary or bilateral transactions.