Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an imported elastic lace making machine, though capable of performing more than one function with special adapters, was entitled to Open General Licence treatment and the benefit of Notification No. 16/85-Cus., dated 01-03-1985, and therefore not liable to confiscation.
Analysis: The goods were classified by customs under Heading 84.37 and the record showed a specific entry for elastic lace making machines both in the Open General Licence list and in the exemption notification. The controlling principle applied was that where a machine is specifically described with reference to its principal function, the exemption cannot be denied merely because the machine can, with alterations or special adapters, perform additional functions. The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions on the same principle and rejected the department's restrictive construction.
Conclusion: The machine was held to fall within the specific entry and to qualify for the notification benefit. The confiscation order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: A machine specifically named in a tariff, import policy, or exemption entry with reference to its principal function remains eligible for the notified benefit even if it can perform additional functions.