Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was a company whose business consisted wholly or mainly in the dealing in or holding of investments for the purposes of section 23A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The relevant statutory test under section 23A and Explanation 2 required the character of the company's business to be determined on the facts and in the ordinary commercial sense of the word "investment". The Court held that "investment" is not a term of art and, in this context, covers money laid out in income-yielding property, including house properties from which rent is regularly derived. The assessee's objects included purchase and letting of lands and buildings, and its principal income was derived from such properties; those activities were treated as the company's main business. The assessment of that income under section 9 did not alter its character for the purpose of section 23A, because the heads of income under the Act are only a mode of computation.
Conclusion: The assessee was a company whose business consisted mainly in the holding of investments, and the question was answered in the affirmative against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the department, and the levy under section 23A was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: For section 23A, the expression "investment" must be construed in its ordinary commercial sense, and income-yielding immovable property held and exploited as a company's main source of income may constitute investments for determining whether the company mainly holds investments.