Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported product, Rubber Reclaiming Agent JACET-350, was correctly classifiable as a lubricating preparation under Heading 3403.19 of the Customs Tariff or as a plasticiser under Heading 3812.20.
Analysis: The product was examined in the light of the chemical examiner's report and the manufacturers' literature. The material on record showed that the goods were intended for use in reclaiming old rubber scrap by a de-vulcanising process, resulting in reduced energy consumption and improved uniformity in the reclaimed rubber. Plasticisers, by contrast, are used to aid processing of rubber compounds and to impart flexibility or plasticity before the rubber is converted into final products. The disputed product was therefore functionally different from a plasticiser and could not be brought under Heading 3812.20 on that basis.
Conclusion: The product was correctly classifiable under Heading 3403.19 as a lubricating preparation. The Revenue's appeal failed.