Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the duty demand on granite slabs cleared for export but not exported was sustainable, and whether the matter required remand because the conditions for re-entry of the goods into the factory under Rule 97A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 had not been properly examined.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the goods had in fact been permitted to re-enter the factory under Rule 97A after the accident and whether the statutory conditions for such re-entry, including the condition regarding value at the time of return and satisfaction of the competent authority, had been established on the record. The available correspondence did not show a clear final order permitting re-entry, and the lower authorities had not examined whether the mandatory conditions under Rule 97A were fulfilled. In the absence of such factual determination, the correctness of the duty demand under Section 11A(1) could not be finally upheld.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the original authority for fresh adjudication after giving the appellants a personal hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the applicability of a duty demand depends on satisfaction of statutory conditions for re-entry of export goods into the factory, and the record does not show proper examination of those conditions, the matter must be remanded for fresh adjudication.