Strict construction of exemption notification bars post facto reversal of utilised Modvat credit to claim nil duty benefit.

Modvat credit already taken and utilised on inputs could not be reversed later to satisfy Notification No. 69/86-C.E. and claim nil or concessional duty on the final product. The Tribunal held that the exemption required no Modvat credit to have been taken for the relevant inputs, and the scheme did not permit a post facto reversal after utilisation merely to bring the goods within the notification. As exemption notifications must be strictly construed, the credit mechanism could not be neutralised retrospectively to secure exemption. The denial of exemption was therefore upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit already taken and utilised in respect of inputs could be reversed later to satisfy the condition of Notification No. 69/86-C.E. and claim the concessional or nil rate of duty on the final product.

Analysis: The notification required that, for clearance at nil rate, Modvat credit should not be taken in respect of the inputs used in the exempt final product. The Tribunal held that the scheme did not permit reversal of credit already utilised merely to bring the goods within the exemption. The exemption notification had to be strictly construed, and the Modvat Rules did not provide any mechanism for such post facto reversal to secure the benefit. The reasoning also rested on the principle that credit under the scheme is linked to the relevant inputs and cannot be shifted or neutralised after utilisation to obtain an exemption.

Conclusion: The reversal of Modvat credit did not entitle the assessee to the benefit of Notification No. 69/86-C.E.; the denial of exemption was upheld against the assessee.

---