Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ammonium chloride manufactured by the respondent was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 66/71 dated 29-05-1971 as fertilizer used in the manufacture of fertilizer falling under Item 14HH.
Analysis: The entitlement to exemption depended on whether the goods, in commercial reality, could be regarded as fertilizer and whether they were shown to have been used in the manufacture of fertilizer. The distinction between theoretical capability and commercial identity was material. Ammonium chloride of higher purity was commercially different from fertilizer grade ammonium chloride, and classification had to follow commercial parlance rather than a merely technical possibility of use. The respondent's own classification list stated that the goods were neither cleared nor manufactured and sold as fertilizer, and the cited circular did not extend exemption beyond fertilizer as such.
Conclusion: The goods were not shown to be used in the manufacture of fertilizer and were not entitled to the benefit of the notification. The appeal succeeded and the exemption claim failed.
Ratio Decidendi: For excise classification and exemption, the relevant inquiry is the commercial identity and actual use of the product, not its theoretical capability of being used as fertilizer.