Pre-deposit in classification dispute refused where forge products appeared semi-finished and financial hardship was not shown.

In a stay-stage classification dispute concerning forge products for the automobile industry, the goods were viewed prima facie as semi-finished and therefore more appropriately classifiable under Chapter 72 rather than Chapter 73. The applicants also failed to show financial hardship sufficient to justify dispensing with pre-deposit, as the balance sheet indicated substantial sales revenue and an ability to make the deposit. Interim relief was therefore refused, and the pre-deposit requirement was maintained pending hearing of the appeal on merits.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit in a classification dispute concerning forge products for the automobile industry.

Analysis: The dispute was at the stay stage. On a prima facie view, the goods appeared to be in a semi-finished stage and therefore more appropriately classifiable under Chapter 72 rather than Chapter 73. The financial material also did not establish such hardship as would justify dispensing with the pre-deposit, since the balance sheet reflected substantial sales revenue and a satisfactory position to make the deposit.

Conclusion: The application for dispensing with pre-deposit was rejected and the applicants were directed to make the pre-deposit demanded.

Final Conclusion: Interim relief was declined and the pre-deposit requirement was maintained pending hearing of the appeal on merits.

---