Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether MODVAT credit on inputs lying in stock could be availed before written approval under the relevant MODVAT procedure, and whether the matter required verification by the Assistant Collector before final sanction.
Analysis: The appellants had filed the declaration under Rule 57G and simultaneously moved an application under Rule 57H for credit on inputs lying in stock. The record showed that the inputs were declared and the assessee was otherwise eligible for credit, but the material before the Tribunal did not satisfactorily establish proper verification of the quantity and eligibility of the inputs actually lying in the factory. Since entitlement depended upon verification of the records and the stock position, the issue could not be finally concluded without re-examination by the departmental authority.
Conclusion: The assessee was held eligible for MODVAT credit in principle, but the Assistant Collector was directed to re-examine the records and sanction credit only to the extent of inputs satisfactorily proved to have been lying in stock.
Ratio Decidendi: Eligibility to MODVAT credit may subsist notwithstanding absence of prior written approval, but sanction of credit on stock inputs is subject to proper verification of the declared inputs and supporting records.