Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit pending appeal in the light of its claim to the benefit of Notification No. 175/86 despite having availed Modvat credit in respect of branded goods.
Analysis: The appellant claimed that it had not taken Modvat credit in respect of its own branded goods and that the denial of exemption was based on an incorrect understanding of the notification scheme. The record also disclosed a Board clarification stating that, where separate accounts are maintained, Modvat credit on inputs used for export production cannot be denied merely because the assessee avails full exemption for home clearances under Notification No. 175/86. The Tribunal treated this clarification as supporting the appellant's prima facie case.
Conclusion: The appellant was granted waiver of pre-deposit of duty pending appeal.