Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether heavy melting scrap imported as melting scrap was covered by the additional licence under Sr. No. 17 of Appendix 5A of the Import Policy, or whether it fell under Sr. No. 147 of Appendix 2B and was therefore unauthorised.
Analysis: Sr. No. 17 of Appendix 5A covered waste and scrap for remelting in any form or condition, while Sr. No. 147 of Appendix 2B covered defective or scrap material not otherwise specifically provided for in the relevant appendices. The goods had been cleared as melting scrap under Notification No. 480/86-Cus., and the importer, being an actual user, had executed the end-use bond. On the construction of Para 21(b), an item in Appendix 5 prevails over an item in Appendix 2 Part B, and Para 21(c) was read as governing inter se priority between specific and generic descriptions within the relevant appendices. The specific entry for scrap for remelting in Appendix 5A therefore prevailed.
Conclusion: The licence was valid for import of the melting scrap, and the objection based on Appendix 2B failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where imported goods squarely fall within a specific entry in Appendix 5A covering scrap for remelting, that entry prevails over a more general entry in Appendix 2B and authorises the import.