Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported Gaulin-3 Plunger High Process Homogenizer was classifiable under Item 84.17(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 or under Item 84.26 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Analysis: Classification was to be determined in accordance with the tariff heading terms and the relevant section and chapter notes. For multipurpose machines, the governing principle was that they are classified according to their principal purpose or main function. The equipment in question was found to be meant for both food processing and dairy processing, and not exclusively for dairy use. The explanatory notes to the CCCN could have only persuasive value and could not override the tariff scheme. Since the machine answered both the food-processing heading and the dairy-machinery heading, Note 2 to Chapter 84 required classification under the former heading.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under Item 84.17(2) and not under Item 84.26.