Modvat credit on endorsed gate pass denied for pre-deposit waiver without compliance with prescribed input procedures.

Prima facie, an endorsed gate pass could not automatically support Modvat credit for bottles moved after the original consignment had been broken up, because the document had already served its purpose and further movement required compliance with the prescribed Modvat procedure. The record also did not show compliance with the rules governing receipt and processing of inputs, and the printers were not treated as job workers of the appellants. On that basis, complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined, but partial dispensation was allowed subject to deposit of specified sums, with the balance stayed pending appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to dispensation of pre-deposit of the duty and penalty demanded in respect of the claimed Modvat credit on the bottles received under an endorsed gate pass.

Analysis: The claim for waiver was examined on a prima facie basis. The bottles had originally been cleared to another consignee, were subsequently printed, and were then supplied to the appellants under the same gate pass after the original consignment had been broken up. The gate pass, once it had served its purpose of covering the goods to the original consignee, could not prima facie be treated as a valid document for further movement unless the procedure prescribed under the Modvat rules was complied with. The record also did not show compliance with the requirements governing receipt and processing of inputs through the prescribed procedure, and the printers were not treated as job workers of the appellants.

Conclusion: The appellants were not entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit. Partial dispensation was granted on condition of deposit of specified sums, and the balance was stayed pending appeal.

---