Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported mechanical track wrench for undercarriage track shoes was classifiable under Heading 84.59(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as a machine designed for the production of a commodity, or under the residuary Heading 84.59(1).
Analysis: The imported equipment was shown by the manufacturer's literature and the manufacturing process note to be essential for tightening and loosening high-tensile bolts and nuts during assembly of crawler tractor undercarriages. The appliance was used in the production process and was necessary for manufacture of the undercarriage assembly, which could not be completed manually with the required torque. On that basis, the item answered the description of machinery designed for production of a commodity rather than a residuary machine not elsewhere specified.
Conclusion: The mechanical track wrench was classifiable under Heading 84.59(2) and not under Heading 84.59(1), and the classification adopted by the lower authority was . The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a machine is specifically designed and used as an essential part of the production process for manufacturing a commodity, it falls under the production heading and cannot be classified under a residuary tariff entry.