Reasoned penalty orders and timely service tax returns determine liability under the Finance Act, with partial relief granted.

Penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 was held unsustainable because the adjudicating order did not record reasons; a penalty order must be supported by a speaking decision, and the omission could not be ignored. Penalty under Section 77 was upheld because the assessee failed to file ST-3 service tax returns within the prescribed time under the statutory return-filing obligation. The result was partial relief: the Section 76 penalty was set aside, while the Section 77 penalty remained in force.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 was sustainable when the original adjudication did not contain reasons; (ii) whether the penalty imposed under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 was sustainable for failure to file the prescribed service tax returns within time.

Issue (i): Whether the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 was sustainable when the original adjudication did not contain reasons.

Analysis: The appellate authority accepted that the adjudicating order did not record reasons for imposing penalty under Section 76. In the absence of a speaking order, the penalty could not be sustained merely on a ground that the omission in reasoning should be ignored.

Conclusion: The penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 was not sustainable and was set aside.

Issue (ii): Whether the penalty imposed under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 was sustainable for failure to file the prescribed service tax returns within time.

Analysis: The appellants were required to file service tax returns in Form ST-3 within the prescribed period under Section 70(1) of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994, but failed to do so. The penalty under Section 77 was imposed for non-compliance with the return-filing obligation.

Conclusion: The penalty under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only in relation to the penalty under Section 76, while the penalty under Section 77 remained in force, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: A penalty based on adjudication must be supported by reasons, whereas failure to furnish statutory returns within time attracts penalty under the service tax law.

---