Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether wood peeling knives designed for exclusive use with wood-working machines were classifiable under sub-heading 8208.20 or under sub-heading 9806, and whether they were entitled to the benefit of the relevant customs notifications.
Analysis: The Tribunal applied the earlier Larger Bench view that parts of machinery falling under Chapter 84 were classifiable under Heading 98.06. It also held that, even if such goods could otherwise be regarded as tools under Chapter 82 for notification purposes, they were excluded from the benefit of the notification by the express proviso dealing with interchangeable tools. On that basis, the disputed knives, being designed for use with wood-working machines covered by Heading 84.65, fell within sub-heading 9806 and were not eligible for the claimed concessional treatment.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classified under sub-heading 9806, and the appeal was rejected.