Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for valuation under Rule 6(b)(ii), the duty paid on inputs taken as Modvat credit was to be included in the cost of manufacture while computing the assessable value.
Analysis: The appeal arose at the stay stage, so the question was only whether a strong prima facie case existed. The proceedings had been initiated under Rule 6 of the Valuation Rules, not under Section 4 of the Act, and the issue was how the cost of manufacture was to be worked out in that framework. The Board guidance and the accounting guidance relied upon indicated that Modvat credit on inputs need not form part of the assessable value. Since the goods were captively consumed and the credit was utilised for duty payment on the final product, the cost of production would stand reduced to the extent of such credit.
Conclusion: The exclusion of Modvat credit from the cost of manufacture was accepted at the prima facie stage, and recovery of duty was stayed on execution of a personal bond.
Ratio Decidendi: For valuation under Rule 6(b)(ii), Modvat credit on duty-paid inputs is not to be included in the cost of manufacture when computing assessable value, at least where a strong prima facie case is made out.