Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether chemically treated marine plywood, treated with copper chrome and arsenic, was classifiable as fire-proof plywood excluded from the exemption under Notification No. 55/79, or continued to be marine plywood eligible for the concessional rate of duty.
Analysis: The notification granted concessional duty to marine plywood but excluded commercial plywood, including fire-proof plywood, from its scope. The finding accepted below was that the treated plywood became fire-resistant and satisfied the ISI specification for fire-proof plywood, and that it was distinguishable from ordinary marine plywood. On that basis, the treated goods fell within the excluded category and could not be treated as marine plywood merely because their essential character was said to remain unchanged.
Conclusion: The chemically treated marine plywood was correctly treated as fire-proof plywood excluded from the exemption, and the alternative claim for assessment as marine plywood at 10% ad valorem was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the lower authorities was upheld and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tariff exemption excludes fire-proof plywood, goods that, on accepted findings, satisfy the fire-proof specification after chemical treatment and are commercially distinct from ordinary marine plywood are not entitled to the marine plywood concession.