Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether additional Modvat credit could be taken in respect of stock of indigenous rice bran oil lying in the factory on the date of an enhancing notification.
Analysis: The relevant scheme under Rule 57K and the notification issued thereunder distinguished between the grant of credit on receipt of inputs in the factory and the utilisation of that credit for payment of duty when the inputs were used in manufacture of the final product. The enhancement in the rate of credit did not create a right to inflate credit already taken by adding differential credit on closing stock. The cited decision on subsequently paid differential duty was held inapplicable because the present case did not involve later payment of duty on the inputs.
Conclusion: No differential credit was admissible on the stock lying in the factory on 1-3-1988; the issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the Revenue's appeal was allowed, with the denial of differential Modvat credit sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a notification enhances the rate of Modvat credit, the enhanced rate governs utilisation of credit on eligible inputs, but it does not permit retrospective addition of differential credit on stock already lying in the factory on the notification date.