Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were required to pre-deposit the duty amount pending appeal, and whether they had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit.
Analysis: The appellants asserted that the items fabricated for use in electricity generation and distribution were not marketable goods and that no manufacture was involved within the meaning of section 2(f) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The Tribunal found that, on the material before it and in the light of the cited precedent, the appellants had a prima facie case on merits.
Conclusion: The pre-deposit of duty was dispensed with and recovery proceedings were stayed during the pendency of the appeal, in favour of the appellants.