Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest paid on borrowed capital used for the business could be disallowed in part merely because the assessee charged a lower rate of interest on its lendings than the rate at which it borrowed funds.
Analysis: The capital was found to have been borrowed for the purpose of the business. Once that finding stood, the assessee was entitled to deduct the interest actually paid on such borrowed capital under section 10(2)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1922. The mere circumstance that the assessee charged a lower rate on its advances, including advances to persons connected with it, did not justify scaling down the statutory deduction.
Conclusion: The disallowance of part of the interest payment was not justified, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.