Corroborative private records can prove clandestine removal, while captively consumed ingots for dutiable forgings may remain exempt.

Corroborative private records, including scrap logs, production and despatch registers, weigh-bridge entries and internal slips, were treated as sufficient evidence of clandestine manufacture and removal of steel ingots, though the quantity had to be reworked after crediting goods already accounted for. Ingots transferred within a composite factory to the forging section were held eligible for exemption where the resulting forgings were cleared on duty, so duty could not be demanded on such captively consumed inputs merely because of record-keeping objections. The duty demand survived only on the balance quantity, and the personal penalty was reduced accordingly.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the documentary evidence relied upon by the Department established clandestine manufacture and removal of steel ingots to the extent alleged. (ii) Whether ingots transferred for captive use in the forging section were exempt from duty under the relevant exemption notification and the Central Excise Rules.

Issue (i): Whether the documentary evidence relied upon by the Department established clandestine manufacture and removal of steel ingots to the extent alleged.

Analysis: The seized records, including scrap records, log sheets, bill book entries, chemical analysis register, production and despatch register, weigh-bridge register, despatch slips and internal records, were found to be mutually corroborative. The entries reflected actual heat-wise and day-to-day production, despatch and movement of material, and the assessee's explanation regarding rough estimates, recycled defective ingots and non-accountal was not accepted. The documentary trail supported the Department's case, though the quantities had to be reworked with the benefit of quantities already accounted for.

Conclusion: The allegation of clandestine removal stood established, but only to the extent finally quantified by the Tribunal.

Issue (ii): Whether ingots transferred for captive use in the forging section were exempt from duty under the relevant exemption notification and the Central Excise Rules.

Analysis: The assessee was a composite unit manufacturing ingots and forgings, and the internal gate passes showed transfer of ingots to the forging section. Since the forgings made out of the ingots were cleared on payment of duty, the exemption for inputs used within the factory in the manufacture of finished excisable goods was held applicable. The benefit of the notification could not be denied merely because the inputs were not entered in the statutory records in the manner alleged by the Department.

Conclusion: Duty was not payable on the quantity of ingots captively consumed in the manufacture of dutiable forgings to the extent covered by the notification.

Final Conclusion: The duty demand was sustained only on the balance quantity after excluding the captively consumed ingots covered by the exemption, and the personal penalty was reduced accordingly.

Ratio Decidendi: Corroborative seized private records may establish clandestine production and removal, but duty cannot be demanded on inputs captively consumed within the factory for manufacture of dutiable final products where the exemption notification applies.

---