Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether second-hand machinery imported for use in an Export Processing Zone could be treated as permissible for import despite the age and residual-life condition contained in the import policy.
Analysis: The import policy governing second-hand machinery had to be read harmoniously with the special permission applicable to Export Processing Zone units. The declaration regarding age and residual life would be meaningless unless the machinery satisfied the policy condition limiting import of old machinery. On that construction, the machinery above seven years of age was not permissible for import. At the same time, the facts showed that the machinery had been supplied free of cost, was intended only for export production, was lying in bonded warehouse, and had a residual life exceeding five years, which justified leniency on the quantum of penalty.
Conclusion: The import of the second-hand machinery was held to be not permissible in law, but the redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 1,00,000 to Rs. 25,000.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the limited extent of reduction of fine, while the adverse finding on the permissibility of import was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: A special import permission for Export Processing Zone units does not override a policy condition on the age and residual life of second-hand machinery, and the policy must be construed so that the prescribed declaration has legal effect.