Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the confiscated goods could be treated as absolutely confiscated despite payment of redemption fine after expiry of the initially fixed period, and whether the subsequent communication from the Superintendent effectively extended the time for such payment.
Analysis: The order fixing a time limit was treated as an exercise of ancillary power, but that discretion had to be used rationally and in harmony with the statutory scheme requiring an option to pay fine in lieu of confiscation. The record showed that no order closing the option was passed after expiry of the original period. Instead, the department itself sent a further communication asking for immediate payment, and the fine was deposited within about five days. In these circumstances, the authority's refusal to extend time post facto, without justification, was held inconsistent with the legislative intention. The subsequent departmental notice was treated as supporting an inference that the time stood extended.
Conclusion: The absolute confiscation could not be sustained, the redemption option was treated as validly exercised, and the goods were directed to be released in favour of the assessee.