Modvat credit disclosure in statutory returns defeats suppression-based extended limitation for irregular credit demand.

Incomplete Modvat declarations under Rule 57G do not, by themselves, establish suppression of facts or wilful mis-statement when the credit avails are disclosed in statutory RT-12 returns and other records are available for departmental scrutiny. In such circumstances, the department has an opportunity to verify the position and take corrective action under Rule 57-I(1), so the extended period of limitation is not attracted. Later furnishing of additional particulars does not retrospectively convert the earlier disclosures into clandestine or suppressed transactions. The demand based on suppression therefore fails and the credit dispute is confined to the ordinary limitation period.

---

---

Issues: Whether the incomplete declaration filed for Modvat purposes amounted to suppression of facts or wilful mis-statement so as to attract the extended period of limitation and sustain the demand of irregularly availed credit.

Analysis: The declaration under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was general and incomplete, but the availment of credit was reflected in statutory statements and RT-12 returns regularly submitted to the departmental authorities. The relevant records were available for verification, and the department had the opportunity to detect any discrepancy and take corrective action under Rule 57-I(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. On these facts, the omission could not be treated as a deliberate suppression of material facts or wilful mis-statement. The later furnishing of further particulars also did not retrospectively convert the earlier credit avails into clandestine or suppressed transactions.

Conclusion: The extended period of limitation was not attracted, and the demand based on suppression failed. The appeal was allowed and the impugned order was set aside.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the availing of Modvat credit is disclosed in statutory returns and the relevant records are available for departmental scrutiny, an incomplete declaration by itself does not constitute suppression of facts or wilful mis-statement for invoking the extended period of limitation.

---