Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether modvat credit on inputs could be allowed and retained when the final products were subsequently cleared under exemption, and whether Rule 57C barred such credit despite compliance with Rules 57A, 57F and 57G.
Analysis: The credit scheme required the inputs and the declared final products to be covered under the declaration and the credit to be taken in the manner prescribed. Rule 57C operated as a restriction on allowance of credit where the final product was exempt from the whole of duty or chargeable to nil rate of duty. The earlier decisions relied upon were distinguished because one concerned conditional exemption and the other dealt with a different set-off provision. On the facts found, the finished products were cleared under exemption and the credit had already been utilised, so the nexus between the admissibility of credit and the exempt status of the final product became decisive.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was not admissible in the circumstances, and the demand for duty was sustainable against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the departmental demand was restored by setting aside the order in appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the modvat scheme, credit on inputs is not allowable where the final product is exempt from duty or chargeable to nil rate of duty, and the admissibility of credit depends on the status of the final product at the time the credit is sought to be allowed.