Tobacco snuff classification remains under snuff entry when processing does not alter essential character, with back-duty demand mechanism available.

Processing tobacco snuff by curing, pulverising, mixing, grinding, sieving and adding flavouring substances did not change its essential character where the product still consisted wholly of snuff tobacco. The text distinguishes snuff of tobacco from preparations containing snuff, treating the latter as a composite product in which snuff forms only part of the whole. It also states that an approved classification list may be modified and duty may be demanded for the back period under Section 11A as a consequence of that modification. The material therefore turns on tariff classification and the reach of consequential duty demand.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the goods, after curing, pulverising, mixing, grinding, sieving and addition of flavouring substances, perfumes and menthol, remained classifiable as snuff of tobacco under sub-heading 2404.50 or became preparations containing snuff of tobacco under sub-heading 2404.60 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; (ii) Whether the approved classification list could be modified and duty demanded for the past period under Section 11A of the Central Excises & Salt Act.

Issue (i): Whether the processed goods retained their classification as snuff of tobacco or were classifiable as preparations containing snuff of tobacco.

Analysis: The tariff distinguished between snuff of tobacco and preparations containing snuff of tobacco. The product was found to consist of 100% snuff tobacco even after the addition of menthol and perfumes, and the added processes did not alter its essential character. The treatment made the product marketable and fit for consumption, but that by itself did not convert it into a preparation containing snuff in any proportion. The specific entry for preparations contemplated a composite product in which snuff formed only a fraction of the whole, which was not the case here.

Conclusion: The goods were classifiable under sub-heading 2404.50 as snuff of tobacco and not under sub-heading 2404.60.

Issue (ii): Whether modification of the approved classification list and demand of duty for the back period under Section 11A were permissible.

Analysis: The settled position applied by the Tribunal was that an approved classification list could be modified and duty could be demanded for the relevant back period under Section 11A as a consequence of such modification. The earlier authorities cited were treated as supporting that course.

Conclusion: The modification of the classification list and consequential duty demand for the back period were permissible.

Final Conclusion: The majority held that the product continued to be snuff of tobacco under the tariff and that the consequential demand mechanism under Section 11A was available, but the appeal was ultimately allowed on classification.

Ratio Decidendi: Where processing does not change the essential character of tobacco snuff, and the resultant goods are not a distinct composite preparation containing snuff in any proportion, the goods remain classifiable under the tariff entry for snuff of tobacco rather than the entry for preparations containing snuff.

---