Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported machine, whose main function was precision measurement for inspection, quality control and quality assurance with an additional layout function, was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 394/76-Cus. dated 02.08.1976.
Analysis: The notification was construed as extending exemption not only to instruments used solely for measuring, but also to instruments used for both measuring and checking. The decisive test was whether the primary function of the instrument was measuring or checking and measuring. On the catalogue and functional description, the machine was found to perform precision measurement as its foremost function, while layout was only supplemental or additional. The view that exemption was confined to instruments with sole measuring function was rejected.
Conclusion: The imported goods were held entitled to the benefit of the notification, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the assessee obtained exemption-related relief on the basis that the machine was primarily a measuring or checking instrument.