TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether duty was recoverable on the waste arising during conversion of nylon yarn into tyre cord and tyre cord fabrics. (ii) Whether the demand was barred by limitation.
Issue (i): Whether duty was recoverable on the waste arising during conversion of nylon yarn into tyre cord and tyre cord fabrics.
Analysis: The majority held that the relevant transaction was not merely doubling or twisting of yarn, but a case where duty on yarn had been deferred until clearance of the tyre cord fabric. The single nylon yarn issued for manufacture of tyre cord became a distinct commodity with a different name and use, and duty was payable on the entire quantity issued for manufacture of the fabric. The waste arising in the course of conversion was therefore also liable to duty, and the reasoning treating the process as not amounting to manufacture was rejected as inapplicable on the facts.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether the demand was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The majority held that the assessee had not disclosed the relevant quantity of waste arising during conversion of yarn into tyre cord, and the RT-12 returns relied upon did not cover the material period or the relevant stage of manufacture. On that basis, the extended period of limitation was held to be correctly invoked.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The Department's demand for duty on the waste and the invocation of the extended limitation period were upheld, and the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where excisable yarn is issued for manufacture of a distinct commodity and duty is deferred till clearance of the finished fabric, duty remains payable on the entire quantity issued, including waste arising during conversion, and the extended period may apply where the relevant waste is not duly disclosed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
