Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal affirms duty liability for imported goods classified under specific headings, rejecting appeal.</h1> <h3>LUXOR PEN COMPANY Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA</h3> LUXOR PEN COMPANY Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA - 1994 (70) E.L.T. 294 (Tribunal) Issues Involved:1. Classification of imported goods under the appropriate Customs Tariff Heading.2. Applicability of Note 3 to Chapter 32 of the Harmonised System of Nomenclature (HSN).3. Determination of duty liability based on the classification of goods.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Classification of Imported Goods:The primary issue was whether the imported raw material for the manufacture of crayons, composed of synthetic resin, wax, organic colouring matter, and inorganic filler, should be classified under Heading 3204.17 and 3206.10 as held by the lower authorities or under Heading 3901.10 as claimed by the appellants. The Assistant Collector had classified the goods based on organic colouring matter under Heading 3204.17 and those based on Titanium Dioxide under Heading 3206.10, demanding a higher duty amount. The appellants contended that the goods were correctly classifiable under Heading 39.01, arguing that the goods were not based on colouring matter and were not used as ingredients in the manufacture of colouring preparations. They emphasized that the predominant constituent was polyethylene and not colouring matter.2. Applicability of Note 3 to Chapter 32 of HSN:The appellants argued that Note 3 to Chapter 32 was not relevant and that the goods could not be deemed as colouring preparations since they do not find use in colouring plastics or rubber. They contended that the final product, namely crayon, was an article and not a colouring preparation. On the other hand, the respondents maintained that the imported goods were meant for use as raw material for the manufacture of crayons, which are colouring preparations since they impart color to paper. The Tribunal examined the Notes to Chapter 39 and Chapter 32 of the HSN and found that concentrated dispersions of colouring matter in plastics having the character of products of Chapter 32 are excluded from the scope of Chapter 39. The Tribunal referred to Note 3 to Chapter 32, which applies to preparations based on colouring matters used for colouring any material or as ingredients in the manufacture of colouring preparations.3. Determination of Duty Liability:The Tribunal observed that the imported goods were in the form of coloured irregular chips composed of synthetic resin, wax, fillers, and organic and inorganic colouring matters. The major constituents were polyethylene (32.7 to 50%) and colouring matter (11 to 18%). The Tribunal concluded that the imported goods were preparations produced by mixing polyethylene with other materials, thus falling under the scope of Chapter 32 as preparations used for colouring any material or as ingredients in the manufacture of colouring preparations. Consequently, the goods based on synthetic organic colouring matter were classifiable under Heading 3204.17, and those based on Titanium Dioxide were classifiable under Heading 3206.10, as held by the Collector (Appeals). The Tribunal confirmed the order appealed against and rejected the appeal, thereby upholding the duty liability determined by the lower authorities.Conclusion:The Tribunal confirmed the classification of the imported goods under Headings 3204.17 and 3206.10, as determined by the lower authorities, based on the interpretation of Note 3 to Chapter 32 of the HSN and the nature of the goods as preparations used for colouring materials. The appeal was rejected, and the order of the Collector (Appeals) was upheld, affirming the higher duty liability.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found