Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether inputs removed as such under Rule 57F(1)(ii) of the Central Excise Rules were liable to duty on the assessable value and at the rate prevailing on the date of clearance, as if manufactured in the recipient factory, rather than by mere reversal of the credit originally taken.
Analysis: Rule 57F(1)(ii) permits removal of inputs on payment of appropriate duty of excise as if the inputs had been manufactured in the factory. The proviso ensures that duty shall in no case be less than the credit allowed, but the main rule contemplates a full duty levy on clearance for home consumption. The deeming fiction places the recipient of the inputs in the position of a manufacturer for the limited purpose of such removal, and the Modvat scheme is a self-contained scheme intended to allow credit for use in manufacture of the final product, not for trading in inputs as such.
Conclusion: The appellants were required to pay duty on the assessable value and at the rate prevailing on the date of removal of the inputs, and mere reversal of credit was insufficient. The issue was decided against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The removal of inputs as such under the Modvat scheme attracts duty as on manufactured goods, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a rule creates a legal fiction treating inputs cleared as such from a Modvat recipient's factory as manufactured goods, duty is payable according to the statutory basis applicable to such deemed manufacture, subject only to the minimum credit safeguard in the proviso.