Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the requirement of pre-deposit of the disputed Modvat credit should be waived pending disposal of the appeal.
Analysis: The appeal involved a prima facie dispute on reversal of Modvat credit for imported inputs. The Tribunal noted that the inputs were duty paid, were eligible for Modvat credit, and had actually been received and used in manufacture. It further held that Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 prescribed receipt of inputs and monthly filing requirements, but did not stipulate any outer time limit for taking credit after receipt. Rule 57I was also treated as a recovery provision for wrongly availed or irregular credit and not as a time-limit provision. On the facts, the Tribunal found that insisting on pre-deposit would cause undue hardship.
Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the disputed Modvat credit was stayed till disposal of the appeal.