Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to dispensation of pre-deposit of duty and penalty on the ground of prima facie case, financial hardship, and the company being a sick industrial unit.
Analysis: The appeal arose from a demand of duty and penalty, and the Bench considered whether insistence on deposit would cause undue hardship. The record showed that the unit had been declared sick by the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, and the order of rehabilitation and the protection flowing from the statutory regime for sick industrial companies were taken into account. The Bench also noted the financial position of the appellant and the contention that recovery during sickness would be oppressive. In these circumstances, the Bench found it appropriate to dispense with the pre-deposit, while leaving liberty to the revenue authorities to proceed in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was dispensed with in favour of the appellants.