Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the claim for exemption under Notification No. 136/92-Cus. dated 11-3-1992 required reconsideration after the goods were found to be finished leather.
Analysis: The lower authorities had recorded a finding that the goods were finished leather in the form of strips and slabs. In that situation, the Tribunal found it unnecessary to decide the broader classification controversy relating to leather scrap vis-a -vis the entry in the Second Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Since the exemption under Notification No. 136/92-Cus. had neither been claimed before nor examined by the authorities below, the issue of eligibility under that notification needed fresh consideration after giving the appellants an opportunity of being heard.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the jurisdictional Assistant Collector to decide eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 136/92-Cus. after affording an opportunity to the appellants.