Rubber-based adhesive classification under Heading 35.06 prevails where Heading 40.05 exclusion applies and demand fails.

Rubber-based prepared glue or adhesive specifically covered by the exclusion to Heading 40.05 is classified under sub-heading 3506.00, not as compounded rubber under sub-heading 4005.00. The analysis applies the tariff headings, Chapter Notes and HSN explanatory notes to distinguish prepared adhesives from compounded rubber in primary form, and rejects the view that the presence of a vulcanising agent is necessary for Chapter 35 classification. It also notes that an order-in-original may be unspeaking if it does not independently address the classification plea and exemption claim, with the result that a demand, confiscation or penalty based on the wrong classification cannot be sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the product manufactured by the appellants was classifiable as prepared glue or adhesive under sub-heading 3506.00 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or as compounded rubber under sub-heading 4005.00, and whether the consequential demand, confiscation and penalty could be sustained.

Analysis: The product was examined in the light of the tariff headings, the chapter notes to Chapters 35 and 40, and the HSN explanatory notes. The material showed that prepared glues and other prepared adhesives are covered by sub-heading 3506.00, while sub-heading 4005.00 covers compounded rubber in primary forms. The exclusion under Heading 40.05 specifically refers to prepared glues and other prepared adhesives consisting of rubber solutions or dispersions, and the reasoning in the cited precedent was found applicable. The view that the presence of a vulcanising agent was necessary for classification under Chapter 35 was rejected, since the definition of adhesive and the tariff scheme did not impose such a requirement. The order-in-original was also found to be unspeaking because the plea on correct classification and the exemption claim was not independently dealt with.

Conclusion: The product was not classifiable under sub-heading 4005.00 and the appellant's classification under sub-heading 3506.00 was accepted. The demand, confiscation and penalty founded on the contrary classification could not stand.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded and the impugned order was set aside, leaving the appellants entitled to the relief sought.

Ratio Decidendi: A rubber-based adhesive or glue that is specifically covered by the exclusion to Heading 40.05 is classifiable under Heading 35.06, and a demand founded on an incorrect tariff classification cannot be sustained.

---