TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal overturns Excise denial, stresses adherence to rules for Modvat credit claims.</h1> <h3>COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Versus VIVIN CONTROLS (P) LTD.</h3> COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE Versus VIVIN CONTROLS (P) LTD. - 1993 (68) E.L.T. 685 (Tribunal) Issues: Modvat credit eligibility based on authenticated gate passes vs. original gate passes.In this judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, MADRAS, the issue at hand revolved around the eligibility of the respondent to claim Modvat credit based on authenticated gate passes instead of original gate passes as required by Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules. The Department contended that any departure from the statutory requirement of producing the original duty-paid document, i.e., the gate pass, should not be condoned, and Modvat credit should not be granted based on an authenticated copy of the gate pass. The Department argued that the impugned order by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) should be set aside on this basis.On the other hand, the respondents argued that the Board had issued instructions allowing manufacturers to obtain certified copies of gate passes from the Range Supdt. in case the original gate passes were lost or misplaced. They highlighted that Trade Notices issued by the Delhi and Bombay Collectorates also supported this practice. The respondents emphasized that the Department had consistently accepted subsidiary gate passes based on the Board's instructions and Trade Notices, making the denial of Modvat credit based on the lack of original GP 1 unfair and discriminatory. They further pointed out that the gate pass in question was duly authenticated by the Range Supdt. at the place of manufacture and the place of destination, ensuring the authenticity and traceability of the goods.The Tribunal considered the submissions from both parties and noted the relevance of the Board's circular, Trade Notices, and the Department's practice in similar cases. The Tribunal found that these factors had not been adequately considered in the impugned order and, therefore, set aside the order. The matter was remanded to the Collector (Appeals) for a reasoned decision in light of the Board's circular, Trade Notices, Departmental practices, and other relevant facts.In a separate judgment by another Member of the Tribunal, the issue of accepting authenticated gate passes in lieu of original gate passes under Rule 57G was further analyzed. The Member questioned the statutory force of the Trade Notice cited by the respondents and emphasized the need for strict adherence to guidelines when accepting substitute documents. The Member expressed concerns about the potential for misuse when authenticated gate passes are used, especially in cases where goods do not directly come from the manufacturer to the claimant of Modvat credit. Due to these concerns, the Member agreed with the decision to remand the matter for a fresh review to ensure compliance with the guidelines and verification of the authenticity of the documents presented.Overall, the judgment highlighted the importance of following statutory rules, Board's instructions, and Trade Notices in claiming Modvat credit based on gate passes, emphasizing the need for proper verification and adherence to established procedures to prevent misuse and ensure the legitimacy of credit claims.
TaxTMI 