Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a refund claim arising under an exemption notification linked to annual turnover was barred by limitation when filed after the end of the financial year.
Analysis: The exemption under Notification No. 43/82-C.E. depended on whether the assessee exceeded the prescribed turnover limit during the current financial year. That fact could be ascertained only on the close of the financial year. The period of limitation, therefore, was to be computed from the expiry of that year and not from each date of duty payment. The distinction between a small-scale exemption and a concessional notification was not material for this purpose where the exemption itself was turnover-based.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not barred by limitation and the assessee was entitled to the refund.