Enhanced deemed credit cannot be claimed retrospectively on inputs already covered by earlier credit and utilisation.

Enhanced deemed credit under the revised MODVAT order was confined to inputs in stock on or after the specified date where credit had not already been availed. Because credit on the same inputs had earlier been taken and utilised, the second proviso to Rule 57G(2) and the revised order barred retrospective application of the higher rate. The claim for additional deemed credit was therefore rejected, and the lower authorities' order was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to additional deemed credit at the enhanced rate under the revised Ministry order for inputs already in stock when credit had earlier been taken and utilised.

Analysis: The revised deemed credit order applied only to stock on or after the specified date where credit had not already been availed. Under the MODVAT scheme and the second proviso to Rule 57G(2), deemed credit represents duty presumed to have been paid on inputs and is linked to the duty leviable under the relevant excise or customs provisions. Where credit under the earlier deemed credit arrangement had already been taken and used, the bar in the revised order operated, and the enhanced rate could not be applied retrospectively to the same inputs.

Conclusion: The claim for additional deemed credit was rejected and the appeal failed on this issue.

Final Conclusion: The order of the lower authorities was upheld, and no further relief was granted on the principal dispute regarding enhanced deemed credit.

Ratio Decidendi: Enhanced deemed credit under a revised order is not available retrospectively where credit on the same inputs has already been availed and utilised under an earlier deemed credit arrangement.

---