Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether "Correcting Tapes" were classifiable under Heading 8473.10 and entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 172/77-Cus., and whether the impugned orders were liable to be set aside.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the appellant's own case, in which the same goods had been held classifiable under Heading 8473.10 and covered by the benefit of Notification No. 172/77-Cus. The present appeals involved the same goods and the same classification dispute, and no reason was found to depart from the earlier view.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Heading 8473.10 and eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 172/77-Cus.; the impugned orders were set aside and relief was granted, subject to Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded on the basis of the Tribunal's earlier ruling on classification and exemption, resulting in full relief to the assessee in these matters.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an identical classification issue has already been decided in the assessee's own case, that view may be followed to determine both the tariff heading and the availability of the connected exemption notification.