Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, where the factory-gate ex-factory price was approved and actual wholesale sales to independent buyers were made at that price, the assessable value under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 had to be based on that price and whether transportation and other post-clearance charges recovered from depot sales were includible in the assessable value.
Analysis: The approved price lists under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 were not disputed, and a substantial portion of sales was effected at the factory gate to unconnected wholesale buyers. On that footing, the value had to be computed under Section 4(1)(a) read with Section 4(4)(d)(i), because once the wholesale price at the factory gate was ascertainable, charges incurred after clearance from the factory did not form part of assessable value. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that post-clearance expenses, including transportation-related charges, are irrelevant where an ex-factory price is available and determinable.
Conclusion: The approved ex-factory price at which sales were actually made to independent wholesale buyers constituted the assessable value, and transportation-related post-clearance charges were not includible.