Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the printing and punching of cartons undertaken on job work amounted to manufacture so as to attract Central Excise duty and require inclusion of the resulting clearances for the purpose of the small-scale exemption.
Analysis: The process of punching was treated as the step that completed the conversion of paper or board into cartons capable of being folded into the required shape. No material was produced to rebut the view that manufacture was completed in the factory of the appellants. On that basis, the activity fell within the meaning of manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, and duty became payable on the cartons so manufactured. Since the goods were dutiable clearances, their value had to be included while testing eligibility under the exemption notification.
Conclusion: The process amounted to manufacture, excise duty was payable, and the clearances were correctly taken into account for the exemption limit.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed because the job-work activity was held to be excisable manufacture and the demand and exemption treatment were upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the job-work process completes the transformation of raw material into a distinct excisable article in the assessee's factory, the activity constitutes manufacture and the resulting clearances are includible for exemption purposes.