Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether corrugated boxes cleared by the appellants to buyers in Nepal and Bhutan, whether directly from the factory or through their own godown, were clearances for home consumption so as to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 105/80 dated 19-6-1980, and whether duty demand and penalty for removal without licence and without following prescribed procedure were sustainable.
Analysis: The exemption under Notification No. 105/80 was confined to goods cleared for home consumption. The factual materials showed that the goods were ordered by buyers in Nepal and Bhutan and were ultimately supplied outside India. Even on the appellants' version that the goods first went to their own godown, the subsequent clearance remained an export clearance and could not be treated as home consumption. Since the exemption was unavailable, the removals without licence, without payment of duty and without compliance with the prescribed declaration and procedural requirements attracted the relevant central excise provisions.
Conclusion: The appellants were not entitled to exemption; the duty demand and penalty were upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption limited to clearances for home consumption cannot be extended to goods ultimately supplied outside the country, whether removed directly from the factory or through an intermediary godown.