Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in valuing processed fabric manufactured on job work basis, the trader's profit was includible in the assessable value for levy of central excise duty.
Analysis: The settled position under the Supreme Court's clarificatory ruling on job work valuation was that the assessable value covers the price of the processed goods leaving the processor's factory, together with the processor's expenses, costs, charges and profit. It does not extend to profits or expenses arising after manufacture. Rule 174 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was read consistently with this principle, and the later supporting decisions relied on the same exclusion of post-manufacturing trader's profit from assessable value.
Conclusion: Trader's profit was not includible in the assessable value. The appeals by Revenue failed.
Ratio Decidendi: In valuation of processed goods manufactured on job work basis, only the processor's manufacturing cost, expenses and profit form part of assessable value, and any trader's post-manufacturing profit is excluded.