Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether MODVAT credit could be taken on countervailing duty paid subsequently on imported inputs that had initially been cleared without payment of duty.
Analysis: The imported inputs were found liable to countervailing duty and the duty was paid later pursuant to demand. The object of the MODVAT scheme is to avoid cascading of duty on inputs, and Rule 57E permits credit where duty is paid subsequently. The fact that the initial clearance was without duty because of a mistaken assessment did not take the case outside the rule. Payment of a time-barred demand did not alter the character of the amount as duty, and the absence of any claim for refund supported availment of credit.
Conclusion: MODVAT credit was admissible to the assessee on the subsequently paid countervailing duty.