Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether salt-melt used in a heat exchanger to remove excess heat generated during an exothermic reaction was eligible for Modvat credit as an input used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The salt-melt was not used as an in-process material and did not participate in the reaction. It functioned only in the heat exchanger to remove excess heat and to keep the manufacturing equipment operational. The use was therefore analogous to a material employed to make the apparatus functional, rather than an input directly connected with manufacture or one consumed in the process. The wider expression "in or in relation to manufacture" did not extend to such use, because the necessary nexus with the manufacturing process was absent.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was not admissible on the salt-melt, and the claim failed.