Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported cable extrusion line, comprising the plastic extruder and allied control drives, ancillary equipment and spares, was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 40/Cus., dated 1-3-1978, or whether the benefit was confined only to the plastic extruder described in the notification.
Analysis: The import documents showed that the goods comprised not merely a plastic extruder but the entire cable extrusion line. The notification specifically used the expression "Plastic extruder above 150 mm sq. diameter". The fact that the remaining components were necessary for the operation of the line did not enlarge the scope of the exemption. Where an exemption notification identifies the goods by specific description, the benefit cannot be extended to other items merely because they are integral to the functioning of the equipment.
Conclusion: The exemption was restricted to the plastic extruder alone and did not extend to the entire imported extrusion line; the claim was rejected and the result was against the assessee.