Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether customs notifications enhancing duty became operative from the date of issue or only from the date they were made available to the public, and whether a demand for differential duty on goods cleared before public availability was sustainable.
Analysis: The goods had been cleared on the same date on which the notifications were issued, while the admitted position was that the notifications were made available for public sale only later. The prior Tribunal decision on the same notifications and on an identical question was followed. The applicable principle was that, where a notification is not made available to the public on the date of issue, it does not operate against goods cleared before such public availability.
Conclusion: The differential duty demand was not sustainable and the appeal was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: A customs notification enhancing duty becomes effective only when it is made available to the public, and not merely on the date of its issue, so it cannot support a differential duty demand for goods cleared before public availability.